Showing posts with label speculative fiction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label speculative fiction. Show all posts

Sunday, April 09, 2023

Stories by folks who know their science!

Let's talk science fiction for a bit.  But first...

After finishing my duties in DC with NASA's Innovative & Advanced Concepts program - (NIAC) - and giving some big-picture strategy talks, I had a rush of pod interviews about artificial intelligence (many focusing on the ill-advised "moratorium petition" that's circulating among some of the world's smartest folks.) 

Just days ago I was interviewed for the Skeptics Society's Michael Shermer Podcast, mostly on the hot topic: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Existential Threats - and my impudently unusual proposal for how to achieve that fabled 'soft landing.'

Anyway, let's turn to a field that's far better-grounded...

... sci-fi.

The second half of this posting will consist of a foreword I wrote for a way-cool spec-fic volume of stories by folks who know their science

Before that...


== Sci-Fi Miscellany ==

 

Hey Dune fans who happen also to be fanatics for exquisite special editions. Here’s Frank Herbert’s masterpiece in gorgeous hardcover (in a fine tray) that's a feast for every sense. (Especially if you have Bene Gesserit psi powers.) And with my own special introduction material about Frank and his masterpiece.


I mean, I’ve had ‘special editions’ (and soon the long-awaited hardcover of Sundiver.) But nothing as lavish as this.


Sci Fi Snob reviews all six novels in my Uplift Universe (setting aside Existence). A very intelligent and thoughtful survey.

 

This year’s anthology, Shapers of Worlds, Volume IV (help fund it now & pre-order on Kickstarter for the next few days), will feature original fiction by David Boop, Michaelbrent Collings, Roy M. Griffis, Sarah A. Hoyt, Sherrilyn Kenyon, Noah Lemelson, Mark Leslie, Edward M. Lerner, David Liss, Gail Z. Martin, Joshua Palmatier, Richard Paolinelli, Jean-Louis Trudel, James van Pelt, Garon Whited, and (ahem) Edward Willett, plus stories by James Kennedy, R.S. Mellette, and Lavie Tidhar. Or get  a deal on the earlier anthologies: Shapers of Worlds, Volumes 1, 2, and 3.

Nicholas Meyer - yes the writer director who saved Star Trek (!) with 'Wrath of Khan' and the other. even-numbered good-ones - has also continued writing terrific Sherlock Holmes spin-offs, as he started with "The Seven Percent Solution." And now with "The Return of the Pharaoh: From the Reminiscences of John H. Watson." Terrific fun with Doctor Watson in the complex-conniving era leading up to the Tut discovery. 


And from the sublime to...


Infinite Odyssey claims to be the first sci-fi magazine created completely with AI, based on human-inputted prompts like: "Write a unique 700-word story on the following topic, and the language will be mystical and engaging. Let the story end unexpectedly and tell the story from a 3rd person perspective…” 


Alas, the example they give is stuff I’d give a C- in any beginner class. Sorry, at my clock speed, life is too short for this, at least for now. Their website offers the first volumes.


Oh, as we enter awards season... well a bit of preening history?... Kiln People received four Second Place awards: the 2003 Hugo for Best Novel; the 2003 Locus Award; 2003 Arthur C. Clarke Award; and 2003 John W. Campbell. (I may hold the runner-up record!) Anyway, it's a way fun read and mind-blower... and now both the ebook and a fine POD trade paperback are back in print with gorgeous new Patrick Farley covers!

 *Try the first chapter free, here.I think you you'll laugh!  Oh, and note one trait of this tale that's rare in sci fi... you'll want the sci fi tech that these future folk take for granted! Though be careful what you wish for. Anyway, remember always to be many! (Addendum. The Postman came in 2nd for novella, then part II came in 2nd for novella the next year... followed by 2nd place for the novel Hugo. Worth noting? Ah well!)


And now, my forward to one of the best anthologies of new short fiction to come out in years!

== Way cool - while plausible(!) - escapism! ==

I wrote the foreword to a way-cool spec-fic volume of stories by folks who know their science! Just released: Inner Space & Outer Thoughts: Speculative Fiction from Caltech and JPL authors. (on Kindle and paperback).

Fact ignites fiction in this first-of-its-kind anthology of speculative tales by Caltech and NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) scientists, engineers, technologists, and students. Experts at the frontiers of their fields, along with renowned Caltech alumni such as David Brin, S. B. Divya, and Larry Niven, present stories about alien astrobiologists, AI parenthood, a quest to preserve our histories beyond the heat death of the universe, a heist to steal engineering secrets from an ancient monk-scientist, the recovery of a long-lost phase of the human life cycle, the demise of Earth’s first intelligent species—billions of years before the rise of humanity, and much more!

I’m told that when I was four years old, I saw Einstein play the violin. Much later, as a Caltech undergraduate, I got to discuss Roman history and Finnegan’s Wake with Murray Gell-Mann. Richard Feynman—famed for bongo-playing, painting, and safe-cracking—briefly stole my date at a student house dance. And the same lesson—one that I tell at each commencement speech—got reinforced every time I wandered hallways at Tech, poking into random doorways to ask: “Say, what are you doing here? And what else do you do?”

What lesson got reinforced?

Be many.

Never settle for zero-sum. None of us has to be just-one-thing.

Every top scientist I’ve been privileged to know—from Bruce Murray and Hannes Alfvén to Sarah Hrdy and Freeman Dyson—had an artistic sideline or hobby that he or she pursued with some passion. A sideline that invigorated their scientific work.

To be clear, I don’t claim “top” scientist rank, though I get some licks in. Still, the lesson took hold, especially when I started writing science fiction tales to vent pressure as a Caltech undergrad, then as an engineer, then UCSD grad student and postdoc. Whereupon at some point my own artistic “sideline” kind of took over—a tail wagging the dog.

Civilization apparently valued me more as a storyteller . . . and who am I to argue with civilization? But I digress.

This volume - Inner Space & Outer Thoughtsteaches the same lesson—let your creative energies flow in many ways—by collecting tales of plausible extrapolation or wonder from members of our loosely bound Caltech stellar cluster . . . from current and past undergraduates to grad students, from postdocs and profs to current or former JPL folk. And what an amazing collection it is!

In most such “community” anthologies, the reader must allow for widely varied skill levels. But what impressed me most about these authors, aside from their vivid imaginative range and depth of scientific speculation, is how each of them developed craft—handling well so many complex methods of fiction narrative. Tricks turning mere chains of letters into incantations that inject ideas, emotions, and thrills into readers’ willing brains! I expected this from my fully fledged and revered colleagues S. B. Divya and Larry Niven. But most of the other writers featured here—many of them first-timers—are already what we used to call “ready for prime time.”

Okay sure, in a volume like this one, you’re expecting gosh-wow extrapolations from the mundane here-and-now. And these techers are explorers! From cool what-if speculations about brain plasticity to the potential costs and losses that accompany immortality. From whimsical science counterfactuals to daunting, Dickean questionings of reality. Several stories offer ruminations about memory, while others ponder eschatology through godlike expanses of time.

Former CIT Professor Christof Koch collaborates in a gedankenexperiment about the implications of “split hemisphere” research that began long ago at Tech. There’s also a dollop of time travel here . . . along with some “don’t get cocky” lessons about how humanity may not be quite the pinnacle that we sometimes imagine. And sure, how could any cosmic- minded collection lack for confrontations with the co-star of almost every human drama. . . . Death?

In fact, the relationship between Caltech and science fiction stretches way back, almost to its beginning. Eric Temple Bell (1883–1960) was a professor and best-selling popularizer of mathematics. But under the pseudonym John Taine he also published rollicking SF tales, while leading a life of mystery that Constance Reid peeled back in her riveting book The Search for E. T. Bell. Frequent Caltech habitués Fred Hoyle and Leo Szilard wrote sci-fi and Robert Heinlein set parts of Glory Road on campus. Around 1970, I watched CIT Poet-in-Residence Richard Brautigan recite “All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace,” which remains to this day the work that best expresses hope and optimism for decency in our AI soon-to-be heirs. Indeed, both that long heritage and this bold new volume illuminate the quandary and the vital role played by science-based science fiction.

Yes, we and the great enlightenment experiment have all benefited from the Popperian cycle of hypothesis, evidence gathering, modeling, and refinement through falsification that propels progress in our studies and our labs and across civilization. Without question, we must defend that process from those who are trying to discredit the very notion of objective reality. Facts exist! And despite Plato’s cynicism, we are getting ever better at climbing out of his damn cave.

Still, it’s clear—there must be something more.

How poor would we be without our other side? A part of us that begins each next step forward by posing what-if questions that cannot yet be checked or falsified? Or those other notions that seem brilliant because they’ll always remain counterfactual? Questions posed not just by sci-fi tales but all the other art forms that draw hard-nosed scientists to croon: “Okay . . . wow.”

Shan’t our reach exceed our grasp? Or, as one of the authors in this volume described his own process of reaching out: “If any of my stories turn out to be anything but pure fiction, I shall be dismayed by my own lack of imagination.”

Oh, do play your instruments, or paint, or whatever, after the sun goes down. Or string together those chains of black squiggles—the letters, words, sentences, and incantations that lure us into envisioning that which never was! And even what can never be. For one thing, it is only with such practice that we truly learn to tell the difference! Besides, something deep within us hungers for mysterious rustles beyond the campfire light.

And so, for now, suspend disbelief. Let words and notions and feelings flow like the magic that enthralled our ancestors. Only these songs and spells are for our time. For our scientific age.

Tomorrow, back in the lab, we’ll feel better empowered to perceive.


* The Caltech TechLit Creative Writing Club is sponsoring an event on campus May 20, in person and remote, with readings, discussions and signings of this anthology, Inner Space & Outer Thoughts.


Wednesday, November 21, 2018

Dire warnings - and hope - from science fiction

Posting just before the U.S. Thanksgiving Holiday - my favorite - let's step back for some big perspective.

For starters: the Planetary Society proposes that space brings us together! So if you're expecting to gather with extended family on Thanksgiving, avoid politics. TPS offers conversation starters about space. Like Monday's Mars landing! Or the search for life out there. How to stop an Earth-aimed asteroid! The arrival of space tourism for the rich. Earth sensing finding the truth about the Arctic and... oops, some things do circle back to politics. Like our outward, exploring spirit. And facts.

You’ll enjoy and be edified by Eliot Peper’s passionate and fascinating interview with journalist and science fiction maven Annalee Newitz about her new novel “Autonomous,” which explores how intellectual property and dominant corporations might (if we’re not careful) lead to coercive oppression and quashed innovation in the future. It’s a vital topic. Both Intellectual Property (IP) trolls and corporate-rights fanatics have taken important enlightenment-pragmatic innovations and turned them into fundamentalist excuses for oligarchy. 

As fitting and proper in a dire-warning tale, Annalee portrays these trends getting worse in the future, with both organic and AI beings suffering effective slavery.

Today we see innovative creations thwarted or forbidden or hidden away — from screenplays to medicines to spare parts that would let you repair your own tractor. Generic drugs get unscrupulously blocked and rapacious giants like Monsanto persecute farmers for accidentally growing wind-blown seeds. This could all get much worse as synthetic agents like AI or blockchain programs start developing their own needs or else exist as wholly-owned sepoys of controlling corporations.

Warnings like Annalee's are apropos and needed. Still, I have yet to see any of the modern jeremiads against “IP-abuse” delve into why our enlightenment experiment created and fostered these things — patents, copyrights and corporations — in the first place. 

Yes, rapacious exploiters have found ways to use patents etc. against innovation and competition. But that masks the reason that copyrights and patents were created in the first place ... in order to foster those good things! (I have a chapter about this in The Transparent Society.)

Ponder the tragic comedy of errors called “human history.” Sure, most of the calamities were wrought by one thing -- stupid governance by feudalism . But there were some other dampers on freedom and progress. 

One was simple human self-interest. If you invented something – say a new plow or better glass – there was only one way for you and your children to profit from the new technology… if you kept it secret.

Consider how many techs we once had, then lost, across 6000 years. Clear glass. The Baghdad battery. Forceps. Damascus steel. Antekythera devices, suggesting there were geared clocks and sophisticated computer-calculators. The steam machinery of Heron of Alexandria. All vanished because someone died, or forgot the recipe, or some invading army killed the two sons who knew the secret.

Patents were designed to solve this by luring inventors and inventions out of the shadows, bribing innovators with a reliable income stream so they would feel an incentive to immediately share their breakthroughs, rather than hide them. And then the miracle would happen. Someone across town would swiftly make an improvement and patent that… and we were off. (See my posting: Considering Copyright - and Patents.)

Sure, over time, shyster lawyers found ways to twist the meaning of this reform in directions never intended, perverting it into a methodology for cheating, parasitism and innovation suppression. So? Please dig the real lesson. Cheating… will… always… happen. That kind of human will always be with us. And correcting such parasitic maneuvers is what politics is supposed to be for.

Which is why politics itself -- as a mature methodology for discussing problems and adults negotiating solutions – had to be killed, starting with the “Hastert Rule” and diving into Murdochism. Indeed, liberals aren't fault-free!  Because they let these perversions of the IP reform turn them away from remembering what IP was originally for. Instead of seeking to correct the perversions, the standard dogma is to toss it all. Both bathwater and baby.

None of which is said in order to turn you away from Automonous, by Annalee Newitz! Her thought experiment is excellent and insightful…

…as is a vivid novel by Karl Schroeder, soon to be offered for pre-sale: “Stealing Worlds,”  which portrays a tomorrow  fully as dark as Annalee’s, for many of the same reasons. It’s a hacker/cyberpunk novel set in a future dominated by dark corporations and even darker rogue algorithms, only with some twists informed by Karl’s expertise in the new world of blockchain coinage and contracts.

Yes, I differ with both authors over where we may be heading – I don’t deem their described failure-mode paths to be highly plausible. (How do you have ever-rising automated production of ever-cheaper and even home-printable goods coincide with massive, super-depression poverty, in which no one can afford to buy anything and revolution simmers around the corner, empowered by spectacularly democratized means of destruction

Such a future would have to entail mass bribery of the lower orders and quelling them with pleasure – Huxleyan rather than Orwellian despotism. There are several possible attractor states  -- many of them unattractive -that such a society may drift toward -- feudal fealty pyramids, revolution, intelligent-though-uncompassionate social contracts – but none of them plausibly combine vast-cheap production with simmering-resentful world-slums, as enticing as those seem for a fiction author.

Still, these are great reads! Moreover, it’s kinda flattering how both novels wind up delivering an ultimate plot resolution similar to the one I came up with, in EARTH (1989) -- a democratized transcendence that replies to the monolithic saviors offered earlier, by the likes of Asimov and Clarke!

Indeed, it is the sort of literal, plausible deus ex machine that might offer our best hope for a soft-landing, amid this ongoing good-and-bad singularity.

== Other explorations of SF ==

Here's as essay on "What is SF" by I guy I've long known. He tries to parse Science fiction as science fiction.

As you know, I prefer "Speculative History," since science does not have to be central to our stories, but change is.  (I've long believed fantasy is about static social structures - generally feudal/demigod - and SF is drawn to thought experiments about how things might be shaken into new forms.)

This essay is more focused, peeking at speculative fiction books set on single-gender planets. An interesting sampler that includes my Glory Season, tangentially. Of course there are many left out. The most important would be Philip Wylie’s 1950s novel The Disappearance in which women-only and men-only worlds both exist in parallel (as the title suggests, separation is sudden), and the overall lesson is surprisingly advanced for the era when it was written.  

The biggest sub-genre that is not alluded-to is the SF’nal world where one gender is so marginalized that it might as well be cattle. In that sub-genre, there are as many angry feminist authors as callously contemptuous male ones.  

== And more fecundity!  ==

Ray Kurzweil's first novel, Danielle: Chronicles of a Superheroine, tells the story of a remarkable girl who, with her super-intelligence and smart technologies, plus help from her friends — solves some of the world’s largest challenges: curing cancer, brokering peace in the middle east, and providing clean water to millions in Africa. And she does it all before her 16th birthday. 

2001: An Odyssey in Words: Celebrating the Centenary of Arthur C. Clarke’s Birth, is an anthology edited by Ian Whates and Tom Hunter, with fiction by Alastair Reynolds, Bruce Sterling, Neil Gaiman, China Mieville, Becky Chambers, Chris Beckett and others, with each story exactly 2001 words in length.

Unfit: a new sci fi magazine worth a look… they aim to explore some kinda surreal stuff… like my own “The Crystal Spheres.”

For a little optimism, and some online vividness, see Seat 14c, a  shared anthology sposored by ANA Airlines, in which one of their 2017 flights winds up in the year 2037. Fun from some of the best writers in the genre.

Here's a fun rundown of novels that play mind games with reality, in the spirit of the recent Nexflix show MANIAC.

And an interesting historical document. A 1964 Playboy interview with Asimov, Pohl, Anderson, Serling, Budrys, Clarke, Sturgeon, Blish, Heinlein… Dang they could and should have then included Judith Merrill, C.L. Moore, and Leigh Brackett, but still, kinda fascinating. Naturally, where they were on-target, you feel a sense of awe.  As you’ll wince at some myopia and failure to see what should have been obvious. And well, there's an unfortunate cartoon. But hey, we’ve made progress!

Children of Time – the sci-fi novel by author Adrian Tchaikovsky that won the Arthur Clarke Award, portrays what may be the last humans attempting to colonize a world already occupied by sapient spiders who had been uplifted by humans with good taste in ship names. And Lionsgate films is in pre-production. It could be great! (The novel sure is.) So here’s hoping.

And finally an important endeavor in civics education by the creator of Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal comix.