Today we’ll update you on the many puzzle pieces
that (surely) some in our military and intel services are putting together,
about our looming War With Iran. These pieces include Donald Trump's recent swerve away from confrontation with North Korea
and China... along with Jared Kushner's Riyadh visit to Crown
Prince
Mohammed bin Salman, followed immediately by the latter’s Saudi power putsch.
Here I’ll lay out the implications of Vladimir Putin’s recent trip to Tehran,
followed by Putin’s personal tete-a-tete today with Donald Trump, much of it beyond
the reach of cameras, in a communist dictatorship next to the Gulf of Tonkin. And now the Saudis are ordering
all their citizens out of Lebanon, and several other
places, as well.
More on all of this below. But first…
Are you frustrated seeing neighbors — and yourself — trapped in tired
ideological rifts and fixations? I've revised my famed questionnaire
to probe beneath clichés like "left-vs-right," illuminating why you feel as you do
about modern issues... and why other smart humans weirdly disagree.
Take the survey. Have your friends and crazy uncles take it! Like
Socrates, I hope questions will provoke new thoughts.
== Turmoil and
consolidation among our Saudi masters… while our Kremlin masters prepare for
the next phase ==
Is it disturbing that Jared Kushner was in Riyadh, consulting with Saudi
Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, just days before the latter staged a
major power putsch? Or that Donald Trump’s praise of that coup was
instantaneous? Is this just another example of Trumpist collusion with a
foreign power who long meddled in U.S. political affairs?
Or is it about finalizing a long-planned war vs. Iran? See my earlier list of how many forces want this, from the
Saudis and Trump/Breitbart to Putin and the Iranian mullahs. But like one of
Glen Beck’s conspiracy corkboards, I keep finding threads to connect -- only with blatant facts, not innuendos. For
example…
Not covered by the U.S. news services: Russian President Vladimir Putin, visited Tehran on November 1. That proves nothing, but it is consistent
with the scenario we’re building here, and it leads to an important test, which we’ll get to, in a moment.
First, back to that secret meeting between Jared Kushner and Prince Mohammed
bin Salman. The image of an orthodox Jew dickering with the Saudi leader... might a
silver lining to all this be an Arab-Israeli rapprochement? Discussions have been going on since early in the Obama
Administration. Strategically, it makes sense for the Sunnis to make peace with
Israel, though any deal will go nowhere without a real Palestinian solution.
Indeed, one
alternative or supplement to an Iran war would be such a peace deal, giving Trump a victory
to crow about. And I'd be the first to cheer... if that's all it were.
But consider Saudi Arabia’s Great Big Purge, which toppled foremost
Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, one of the world’s richest men. Media reports cite
him as a major investor in CitiBank and other western institutions. Alas, few
mention the holding that mattered most. Long before the Russians or Chinese or
gambling lords or even Wall Street meddled on behalf of the GOP, there was
Rupert Murdoch, whose Fox News empire could never have grown so, or survived
several crises, without the reliably endless backing of Murdoch’s #1 partner — Alwaleed
bin Talal. Not even Vladimir Putin played a greater role in the deliberate
destruction of American political process.
Alwaleed recently made the mistake of insulting Trump, tweeting “I bailed you out twice,” but now calling DT mentally ill. Big Mistake.
I have one knowledgable friend who claims that bin Salman is the liberalizer -- who propelled the Yemen war that's killed half a million civilians, so far but who is now ousting Wahhabbist fanatics and backers of terrorism. Another friend proclaims Alwaleed the liberal modernist! (Despite his links to Rupert Murdoch.) What seems clear is that the grandsons of ibnSaud are charming, persuasive... and dangerous... fellows.
So should we celebrate? Frankly, I don’t care
about their internal power struggles.
What I fear is they are clearing the decks - eliminating all Saudi elements who might resist war.
== All God’s chillen
want this ===
“They got guns; we got guns; all God’s chillen got guns!”
– The Marx Brothers
When judging a conspiracy theory, one should always (1) beware of concocting a scenario you want to be true, (2) start with all the facts and see if they are consistent, and (3) be open to alternatives. And I will offer up an alternative, toward the end.
Alas, though, the facts seem compelling. No one in the media or politics seems able or
willing to list the powers who will benefit from a US-Iran War. I did, in an earlier posting. But summarizing - all the world's despots and
fanatics are salivating for this:
The Saudis want the Iranian military hit, but above
all seek high oil prices, which will skyrocket when the straits are closed.
The Breitbart-Fox-Trumpists have been openly
slathering for war with Iran for years, and it would distract from Trump's domestic
political troubles. Remember GW Bush's "weapons of mass destruction" in Iraq? Expect some kind of pretext event. Perhaps finalized today, in that meeting by the shores of the Tonkin Gulf.
Some of the dumber factions in Israel want it.
...And the Iranian Mullahs, themselves! They won't
be harmed by a hundred tomahawks going pippety-poppety in a few
places. It will give them an excuse to crush modernists and young
people all across Iran, who are the real threat to their theocratic power. And if the Army is badly wounded, leaving the Republican Guard comparatively stronger? That's well and good, too.
Anyway, what I’ve seen no
one point out is that the Tomahawks will stop the very instant
that the mullahs call on Putin to step in and protect them! That is the
thing our own crazy GOP warmongers never consider. Russia is right next door.
They can stop such a “war” any time they like. All it would take is positioning Russian diplomats and aid workers and observers at every likely target site.
Above all, Vladimir Putin wants a U.S.-Iran War.
The resulting high oil prices will save his regime. And Russia will gain a new,
Persian dependency under Kremlin "protection" -- the warm water
satrapy they've always wanted, going back to the Czars. And if the Iranian military is wounded, and Iran becomes more dependent on Russian protection, all the better. (That simple fact is so blatant, I used it to
get several officers to flip on this issue.)
Let’s return to that November 1, visit to Tehran
by Vladimir Putin. And this is a key
telltale! If Putin’s aim were to prevent
war, he would have announced the Russian umbrella for Tehran now. In advance.
“We will protect our dear neighbor, Iran.”
With that declaration, the Tomahawks would be
deterred. U.S. missiles simply would not fly.
But Putin wants a wave of U.S. Tomahawks to
fly, and so do the Ayatollahs! Just
one round, going bing-bing-bing, raising oil prices and unleashing the mullahs
to crush their own democrats, while doing little lasting damage. Oh, and it will let Kremlin observers measure our
missiles’ parameters…
Then Vlad
steps in, announcing the umbrella, acting as peacemaker and protector while America fumes and waffles, falling back in toddler rage and impotence.
Indeed, Iranian President Rouhani could short circuit this whole cycle and stymie the warmongers by simply announcing the Russian protection agreement. Just announce it! All these schemes would be hampered, if not foiled.
Let me couch this as a challenge. Name one way that
we - our open and democratic/scientific civilization - can even conceivably benefit from an Iranian War. Name one way that despots won’t see asuch a debacle as their win-win. But especially Putin, who calls
the shots in U.S. foreign policy. And who just met with President Donald Trump, with private exchanges, in
communist Vietnam.
Who doesn't want a Iran
war? Not the sane/sober members of the U.S. military who would be sent to
fight it.
Others will benefit! Enemies of our civilization. But not us.
== Vlad our impaler
==
“Information confrontation,”
or IPb (informatsionnoye protivoborstvo), is the Russian government’s term for
conflict in the information sphere. IPb includes diplomatic, economic,
military, political, cultural, social, and religious information arenas, and
encompasses two measures for influence: informational-technical effect and
informational-psychological effect.
• Informational-technical effect is roughly
analogous to computer network operations, including computer-network defense,
attack, and exploitation.
• Informational-psychological effect refers to
attempts to change people’s behavior or beliefs in favor of Russian
governmental objectives.
IPb is designed to shape perceptions and
manipulate the behavior of target audiences. Information countermeasures are
activities taken in advance of an event that could be either offensive (such as
activities to discredit the key communicator) or defensive (such as measures to
secure Internet websites) designed to prevent an attack.
… The variety of
techniques for disseminating Russian propaganda include pro-Kremlin “news”
websites and TV and radio channels such as Russia Today and Sputnik News, bots
and trolls on social media, search engine optimization, and paid journalists in
Western and other foreign media…
Trolls. Russia employs a troll army of paid online commentators
who manipulate or try to change the narrative of a given story in Russia’s
favor.
Bots. Another way Russia manipulates
the information space is through automated pushers of content on social media.
These bots can continuously push content or imitate real life patterns
== The DIA report
continues… ==
Major themes of Russian
propaganda include:
The West’s liberal world order
is bankrupt and should be replaced by a Eurasian neo-conservative post-liberal
world order, which defends tradition, conservative values, and true liberty.
The West demonizes Russia,
which is only trying to defend its interests and sovereignty and act as an
indispensable nation in world affairs.
The United States is
determined to interfere with and overthrow sovereign governments around the
world.
Now mind you, as
many on today’s Confederate right will point out, there are certain angles and
degrees to which we must admit some truth to these accusations!
The expansion of NATO, the earlier
memic-meddlings funded by George Soros, that helped shatter the old USSR – and
especially the way Obama and Clinton helped democracy activists in the Ukraine
get free elections, ripping that nation out of the Kremlin’s orbit – plus
frustration over the rise in secular individualism all over the world – these re-ignited
Russian traditions of paranoia and commitment to feudal hierarchy.
Hence, I don’t call Putin evil,
per se. He is a savvy warrior for the ancient human mode of governance. He
cleverly arranged an anti-western alliance stretching from Ankara and Minsk
and Moscow across the great steppes all the way to Manila, and now including millions of nostalgist-romantics in North
America, all of them aiming at the destruction of our Great Experiment and a return to 6000
years of feudalism.
He's quite open about it. Moreover, from Putin's perspective, there
are real grievances! Take this from Vladimir Putin’s address to the Russian Federal Assembly
following the referendum on annexation of Crimea, 18 March, 2014:
“The USA prefers to follow the rule of the
strongest and not by the international law. They are convinced that they have
been chosen and they are exceptional, that they are allowed to shape the
destiny of the world, that it is only them that can be right. They act as they
please. Here and there they use force against sovereign states, set up
coalitions in accordance with the principle: who is not with us is against us.”
“Major themes of Russian propaganda include:
The West’s liberal world order is bankrupt and should be replaced by a Eurasian
neo-conservative post-liberal world order, which defends tradition,
conservative values, and true liberty.”
== Not the hero of this story ==
You can tell a lot by what your adversary says, in order to make himself out to be
the hero. According to the Putin Doctrine:
“The West demonizes
Russia, which is only trying to defend its interests and sovereignty and act as
an indispensable nation in world affairs. The United States is determined to
interfere with and overthrow sovereign governments around the world.”
And yes! We should squint to see how they see themselves as heroes and
the injured party! Well. Except that:
1) Their complaint boils down to growling that we have interfered in their traditional right
to repress others. Ukrainians, Estonians, Latvians, Lithuanians, Poles and so
on. All the former Warsaw Pact subject nations desperately wanted NATO to move
in. They applied every lever to arm-twist Obama’s reluctant consent. What Putin leaves out is that the subject
peoples that we “stole” from his realm do not want a Russian boot on their
necks, anymore.
To reiterate, it was never U.S. policy to expand NATO. It was invited - even demanded - by people living in desperate fear.
2) Blatantly, the U.S. could have destroyed the USSR and then Russia at
any point across 70 years, especially the last 20. We… did… not. That bald fact is the overwhelming refutation of Russian reflexive paranoia. But that's not all. It's also clear that they would not have been so restrained, were the role ever
reversed. Ask the Ukrainians, Estonians, Latvians, Lithuanians, Poles and so
on. If the Putinists lose this struggle, they will lose only their current political model - rule by mafiosi-oligarchy - in favor of democracy.
If they ever get the upper hand, we will lose all freedom. Possibly all our lives.
3) The system they want the world to return to – “traditionalism” and
top-down command hierarchy -- was tried for 6000 years and utterly failed. Governance in every such society ranged from crappy to horrendous and progress was negligible. The
Periclean-democratic experiment was spectacularly successful – if unstable – way back in 500 BCE. At its second trial run, democracy has been even more successful at delivering every single metric
of human success, for 250 years in America and for all of those who followed our lead. More
successful at every measure than all feudal hierarchies, across 60 centuries. All of them, combined.
That comparison puts a steep burden of proof on Traditionalists.
4) Were he to allow his people a consistently fair and open choice, VP knows they would drift our way.
5) His use of "international law" is ironic. The one thing all despots fear is transparent application of the rule of law. Every time I am invited to speak at a Washington DC "alphabet agency," I focus on what should be the one topmost fact of international strategy:
All our adversaries are lethally allergic to light.
Western institutions are not; they generally improve under light. Hence, while we do still need tactical secrecy in order for our intel and military services to function, our only long-term victory condition is a world awash in vastly pervasive transparency and lawful accountability.
If/when that happens, the result can be summed up in two words.
We win.
== The fundamental
refutation of Putin’s accusation ==
But the ultimate answer to Kremlin rationalizations - and to our own re-ignited Confederacy - can be found in human history. Across time, wherever
there were urban and agricultural societies, there existed one of two conditions:
(1) An imperial power or “pax” enforced peace, though often at a cost of
oppression.
(2) Ceaseless chaos and war between petty nations.
Past empires – Pax Romana, Pax Sinica (China), Pax Brittanica and so on
– featured countless crimes by the dominant power! Crimes that fostered resentment, then hatred and finally the regime’s fall. But along the way, most people were able to get on with their lives, doing business and raising their families in peace.
Wherever situation #2 reigned, cities burned. Brutally and often.
When it became clear that the USA was about to become the pax power for
the second half of the 20th Century, some real geniuses – George Marshall, Acheson, Dulles, Truman, Eisenhower – put serious thought to doing things differently. The empire gets to set the trade rules, for example. And so, instead of the usual imperial mercantilism that cheats the periphery in favor of the capital, Marshall &
co. broke with every past empire to set up a counter-mercantilist trade pattern that favored industrial production in less developed nations. The incredible result was that the US consumer has uplifted almost every nation in the world!
Our core "imperial" project has been to shout at the world: "We'll buy trillions of dollars worth of crap from you! Your factories will hum and your kids will get electricity and schooling. And you can't stop us!"
Under Pax Americana, most nations’
expenditures on defense plummeted from a historic norm of 50% of budget to 5%
or less freeing up vast funds for development…. while the U.S. continued at roughly a 50% level, maintaining the pax, or peace. And please, before you howl, just ask any thoughtful European – especially in the
east – whether they resent that, or feel deeply grateful. Ask the Japanese, or Koreans.
Do all empires commit crimes? Excesses and over-reactions? Abuses of
power? Every single time a nation or
people was tempted by great power, they did such things! We're human! There's much to atone for, e.g. in Chile, Nicaragua, Iran, and especially Southeast Asia. But still, compare to any and every other empire. The ratio of
good to bad deeds was never anywhere near as high as under Pax Americana.
Ask
folks in Vietnam or Chile if they hold a grudge, or instead want to come to California, to visit or to live.
Yes, there are special cases -- they shriek “Death to America” in Iran and Iraq. But for the
most part, we are the least hated empire
in history and even mostly liked! Find one other people who were ever tempted
by imperial power, who did better. One. Find
one. Just one ever.
Even one.
Does that let us off the hook for crimes of empire? For brashly stomping around all holier than thou?
No. But we are the first paramount nation to raise generations of its own kids to be self-critical. Critical of their own country, the way you are, right now! Simmering
and seething at my words, eager to point out mistakes and crimes made by your
own empire.
If anything proves we are above average, it's you. Because criticism is the only known antidote to error. And we train our best and brightest to criticize.
Should we come to an era when there are no empires? When a calm and
mature humanity rules itself fairly, without need for order to be imposed from
above? Absolutely! That dream – portrayed in Star Trek (and undermined in StarWars) – is one that we have pushed
through our national propaganda system called Hollywood. And again, you are an
example.
Only dig it, there has never been such rapid progress toward that goal,
as under Pax Americana, the “empire” that dreams of an era without
empires. For 70 years, poverty has plummeted, science has skyrocketed. Per capita, there is less violence than ever (though islands of horror persist). Technologies offering abundance loom. We are learning the secrets of the
brain-mind and sanity. And never before have so many cared so deeply about
learning the art of planetary management and care.
If all of this is too-little, too-late, then it will be barely. And if we squeak by, to a better future, it will be because of the overall plan enacted by George Marshall and the other geniuses. And because we Americans prevailed over another recurrence of confederate madness in this phase eight of the American civil war, and came out able to lead for a few more decades, till a "pax" is no longer needed.
Look back on those accusations issued by Vladimir Putin! Notice that they are couched
in terms that we taught the world. But they boil down to “under Pax Americana
we don’t get to oppress others!”
Violins of pity and sorrow, Vlad.
== Yes, there are other possibilities ==
In due diligence, let me point you to an Al Jazeera article that claims
the drumbeat for an Iran War is just for show.
It’s possible! Unlike most
conspiracy theorists, (1) I have real world evidence and (2) I pray to be
proved wrong! And there are agencies of our civilization who are fighting,
right now, to make the insanely stupid scenario not happen.
There is a scenario I briefly alluded to, before... that also fits the facts I've listed here. Putin may have gone to Tehran to get the mullahs to agree to peace. Kushner's Riyadh visit might have been about an Arab-Israeli settlement, followed by bin Salman toppling all the hardliner's who would block it. Perhaps followed by an alliance against Hezbollah.
What a glorious victory for Trump to announce, reversing his fortunes! I mention it as an alternative hypothesis that fits many of the observed facts... but that does not fit any of the personalities of the secretive, viciously aggressive players. Nor does it satisfy any of the needs of Vladimir Putin.
Still. Never think for a moment
that Putin and Murdoch and the Kochs are the only masters of today’s GOP.
There’s one that’s pulled the strings for decades.
Now is the time to be wary, fellow citizens of the renaissance. Watch for that pretext. Gunboats in the Gulf of Tonkin... I mean Hormuz. Or a Reichstag Fire. Better fretfully watchful than sorry.
------
ADDENDA:
This article in Rolling Stone looks at some of the same events, drawing conclusions in the same general direction, but leaving out all Russian/Putin/Iranian motives.
