Go to the Heart of the Middle East Problem

The latest Middle-East news makes one almost hope for an invasion by actual intelligent life. Did the Saudis think that executing 47 dissenters on one day, including beheading a prominent Shiite cleric and civil rights activist, would advance their goals? Did the Revolutionary Guard in Iran not realize they were falling for a trap, when they encouraged a mob to sack the Saudi embassy?

In this context, I'd like to step aside (mostly) and offer you guest lecture on aspects of the tragic cluster-frag that just keeps on giving... in the region that gave birth to civilization.

I will surrender the lectern this time to one of the legends of international economics, Mr. Charles Gave, reprinting his essay about the “vanished Middle East” that appeared in John Mauldin’s newsletter. In this piece you will learn from this elderly sage some historical insights that you never knew, about how well-meaning western powers sowed the seeds for today’s horror story… but that for decades another world power has been directly and intentionally fertilizing hate.

To be clear, Mr. Gave is not the only one presenting this long-delayed point (that I have made for fifteen years).  Robert Baer, a retired CIA officer and author of the best-seller “Sleeping With The Devil: How Washington Sold our Soul for Saudi Crude,” has dissected America’s 'selective and insincere outrage against Islamic terrorism' while conveniently ignoring the central role of the Saudi Royal House in fomenting that very threat.  On Salon, David Masciotra makes it political with "Republicans shield these radical Islamists: Why the GOP field won’t talk honestly about Saudi Arabia," starting with one of countless images of former President George W. Bush laughing and holding hands with petro-princes -- and asking why no GOP candidate ever mentions the family that co-owns Fox News.

But let's give the floor to Charles Gave. I’ll chime in, at the end, with some perspective.

  

== Lament for a Vanished Middle East ==
 
By Charles Gave
 

It is desperately saddening to see the terrified population of the Middle East fleeing for refuge towards a Europe that has utterly forgotten what the region looked like just a few decades ago. Yet nobody can hope to understand the disaster that is unfolding if he knows nothing of the events that shaped the modern Middle East.

Through an accident of family history, I was born in the Syrian city of Aleppo 72 years ago, my father having been one of the few French army officers stationed in Syria at the time – 12 out of 500 – to have sided with the Free French forces of Charles de Gaulle, rather than with the Vichy regime of Philippe Pétain.

How can I possibly describe the Syria of my birth? It was a marvel of diversity, a true kaleidoscope of races and religions. All the great empires of the past – from the Mesopotamians to the Ottomans – had passed through, and all had left their traces. Clustered around the citadel of Aleppo, the oldest continuously inhabited city in the world, one found the Armenian quarter, next to the Jewish district, itself next to the Greek settlement. All were surrounded by Muslim areas, variously inhabited by Druze, Kurds, Alawites, Sunni, and Shia. And for the most part all these various peoples lived peaceably together, doing business with each other in good faith. Education was provided by the religious orders. Boys attended schools run by the Jesuits, and the girls were taught by Christian nuns – regardless of denomination.

Before the Conquest

Really “Most of the Christian sects had lived in the region since long before the Moslem conquest, and felt a perfect moral right to live in what was, after all, their home. In the Iraqi capital Baghdad, for example, half the 18th century population was Christian. The Assyrians of Northern Iraq claimed to have been converted to Christianity in the 1st century by Saint Thomas. In the mid-20th century they were a strong community – a true nation. Today there are almost none left. The survivors are in Sweden. In Egypt, the minority Copts, descendants of the original Egyptian population, held important positions in trade, the universities and in politics, with more than a few appointed ministers.

Throughout the region, the Jews were absolutely essential to society and commerce. Of course, Jews had lived in Iraq since the time of Nebuchadnezzar II. But they had also made up much of the population of Alexandria in Egypt ever since it was founded by Alexander the Great – it was in Alexandria that the Old Testament was first translated from Hebrew to Greek. Elsewhere, in all the great historic cities of the region – Cairo, Istanbul, Damascus, Aleppo – Jewish communities made up the network through which different peoples traded with each other.

Each community was an intrinsic part of the social system, and the result was a diverse and resilient society. Of course, once in a while there were problems, such as the Damascus pogroms at the end of the 19th century. But the authorities had little patience with trouble-makers, and quickly restored order.

Today, however, for the first time in history, there are no longer any Jews on the southern shores of the Mediterranean and, outside Israel, few in the Levant. Christians of all denominations have either disappeared, or are under severe pressure, with the Egyptian Copts facing daily attacks. The old social order has broken down completely. The question is: Why?

Family History

To answer, it will be necessary to highlight two historical missteps that have been slowly destroying the Middle East since at least the middle of the 20th century. The first concerns my family history. My grandfather, Ernest Schoeffler, was governor of the predominately Alawite province of Latakia during the French mandate. The Alawites, who are concentrated in north western Syria, are an offshoot of the Shia branch of Islam. Today, they control the political power in Syria, or whatever is left of it.

Conscious of the extreme diversity of the local population, my grandfather promised the Alawites that when the mandate ended they would have their own independent, or at least autonomous, state. Indeed, he lobbied hard in Paris for each Middle Eastern population to have its own “state” as far as possible. He envisaged a Kurdish state, a Christian state centered on Beirut, a Jewish state around Jerusalem, a Druze state, an Armenian state and so on. The idea was that none of these mini-states would be powerful enough to dominate the others. And if there was trouble, the regional policemen – France, Britain, or even Turkey – would step in to re-establish order.

However, in 1936, the leftist Front Populaire was elected in France. My grandfather was summoned to Paris by the Minister of the Colonies, who informed him that thenceforth French policy would be to create a “Greater Syria”. And of course this Greater Syria would be a secular state, because the French left had one overriding obsession: to destroy religion. In response, my grandfather did something few people do today: he stuck to his principles and resigned.

Disastrous Policy

The French government proceeded with its plan to create a unitary state in Syria, with centralized institutions for the army, police, civil administration, justice, education, and health. The consequences of this policy were all too foreseeable. The main goal of each and every different community became to seize control of the apparatus of the state in order to protect its own community. In Syria, by far the largest community, at 60% of the population, was Sunni. To prevent the Sunnis, with their strength of numbers, establishing total dominance over the country, the Alawites, with the tacit approval of the other minority groups, established their own control over the state, which they have ruled ever since.

I have no doubt at all that the refugees fleeing Syria today are minorities terrified that the Alawites will lose power, which up until the Russian intervention looked highly likely. They know full well that if the Alawites were to fall, the Sunni reprisals would fall on all Syria’s minority communities, not just on the Alawites.

The fundamental historical error here was the attempt by the French and the British to create centralized states in the Middle East, states which both the Quai d’Orsay and the Foreign Office believed would, with a little diplomatic maneuvering, do their bidding. This was a total break with the Ottoman tradition. The Turks generally took a hands-off approach to running their empire, intervening only when someone did something especially silly. When that happened, the Janissaries were quickly sent in, and the old order promptly restored. By imposing centralized structures on communities with little in common, the European powers ensured that every local lunatic would attempt to take control of these structures and use them to impose their vision on the other minorities, all too often through “ethnic purification”. It was a recipe for chaos and civil war if ever there was one.

A Wahhabi Project

This brings me to the second historical misstep. For most of their history the Sunnis of Syria and Egypt were peaceful, tolerant people, who lived in tribal groups under the authority of elders who did a reasonable job of maintaining order. This tradition crumbled in no time in the face of the pan-Arab socialism propounded by Egypt’s President Gamal Abdel Nasser and Syria’s Baath Party. As a result, the Sunnis were easy prey for the puritan Wahhabism exported by Saudi Arabia in reaction to the rise of pan–Arab Socialism. Wahhabism is by far the most retrograde of all the different sects of Islam. When Ibn Saud created Saudi Arabia by federating the tribes of the Nejd and Hijaz, he did so with help of the Wahhabi clergy. 

Now, for the last 50 years, money has flowed in a torrent from Saudi Arabia to the rest of the Middle East, Africa, South East Asia, and Europe to build Wahhabi mosques: “schools” where the only things taught – and only to boys – are the Koran and religious extremism.

The goal of this project is to “purify” the Middle East, returning the region, and eventually the rest of the world, to an “original” form of Islam unpolluted by non-Wahhabi religion, or indeed by any influences from the last 1,400 years. Isis is nothing but a Wahhabi project.

Extraordinarily, this project has enjoyed the unstinting support of French diplomacy under the guidance of Jacques Chirac, Nicolas Sarkozy, and now François Hollande. I cannot imagine that this support for the most regressive of Sunni religious movements is due to the fact that close to 10% of the French electorate is Sunni, and that 90% of those vote for the left. That may explain French policy under Hollande, but it cannot account for the policy stance under Sarkozy and Chirac. There can only be two explanations: sheer stupidity, or that French presidents, both of the right and left, have been “captured” by France’s arms exporters.

At the end of this little historical survey – very much influenced by the family history of the writer – the reader must ask what can be done to stop the rot. The answer is simple. First, the West must clearly identify the enemy, which is not the Muslim religion, but the Wahhabi sect. And it must immediately break off all relationships with the states, such as Saudi Arabia and Qatar, which are exporting this virulent form of extremism.

That means closing western embassies in those countries and expelling their citizens from ours. Of course we will have to stop accepting donations from these countries to finance our electoral campaigns, which require ever-increasing amounts of money to win votes for candidates of ever-decreasing legitimacy. That would be very bad news for our media industry, so it may never happen. And needless to say, we must also stop selling these countries warplanes, helicopters, missiles, radars, tanks and other weaponry. That might be sad for our defense industries, but one does not prosper by selling weapons to one’s enemies. As Lenin said: “The Capitalists will sell us the rope with which we will hang them”. Plus ça change…

== Some perspectives ==

Charles Gave is not the only one who is declaring that a time has come to look with clear eyes at what the Saudis have done to our world. Earlier, I linked to the Baer book and the Masciotra article. This NY Times feature article explains in clear detail the differences among Shi'ites. regular Sunnis and the radical Wahhabi Sunni sect pushed hard by the Saudi Royal House.   Here’s another recent essay that I find troublesome and radical in unpleasant ways, yet it expresses a rising sense that people are getting fed-up.  

Do you doubt my assertion that they have meddled in U.S. politics, notably through co-ownership of Fox News and full-ownership of the Bush Family?  Would the American right's full-pitch War on Science have burgeoned so, without Saudi subsidy? Not only to keep us hooked on the oil teat, but also since anti-science is consistent with the teachings of Wahhabi madrassas?

See here how the desert princes fought hard to obstruct the recent Paris Summit from reaching any agreement to address carbon burning and resulting climate change.  Do they actually think that is still in their best interests? In 2030, when half a billion climate refugees flood the world, do they actually imagine that blame won't land where it's deserved?

Do those of you out there, who have helped them in this War on Science and rationality suffer from the same delusion?

It makes me wonder... are so many people finally waking up... because oil prices have plummeted and the U.S. is finally (under Barack Obama) approaching energy independence, no longer reliant upon Middle Eastern oil?  To this awakening, I can only say better late than never.

Dig it. When Saudi citizen Osama bin Laden sent a mostly-Saudi team of radicals (15 out of 19) to commit the attacks of 9/11 on innocent Americans, the reaction of George W. Bush and Dick Cheney was to immediately fly every well-connected Saudi out of the U.S. in luxury charters, at taxpayer expense, to keep them away from questioning by the FBI… all during a week when U.S. airlines were operating under 90% lockdown and very few U.S. citizens were able to fly.  

Barack Obama was ridiculed for wearing a turban once as a teenager and for bowing a bit too low when he first met arab royalty… but photo after photo of GW Bush physically holding hands with Saudi princes – and his statement that “Prince Bandie helped raise me" – do not seem to interest Fox-viewers.

Nor should we expect them to react, given that Rupert Murdoch’s top partners and co-owners of Fox are Saudi princes. Welcome to the American Madrassa.