tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8587336.post3593986009444355029..comments2024-03-29T00:39:31.629-07:00Comments on CONTRARY BRIN: To arms against blackmail... and 'Replacement Theory'... and the suborned CourtDavid Brinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14465315130418506525noreply@blogger.comBlogger200125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8587336.post-3830689627083011332022-07-01T20:34:58.829-07:002022-07-01T20:34:58.829-07:00Huh. Informative stuff...
now onward
onwardHuh. Informative stuff...<br /><br />now onward<br /><br />onwardDavid Brinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14465315130418506525noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8587336.post-85930157351694588382022-07-01T19:21:32.874-07:002022-07-01T19:21:32.874-07:00DP:
The condemnation of abortion without regard t...DP:<br /><i><br />The condemnation of abortion without regard to quickening or stage of fetal development is still the official doctrine of the Roman Catholic Church. Catholics who knowingly procure an abortion face excommunication.<br /></i><br /><br />How does the Catholic church justify excommunication over a break from church doctrine on abortion when they don't excommunicate anyone over disagreeing with church doctrine on the death penalty? Is it explicit doctrine that the church rules are meant to constrain liberals and protect right-wingers?Larry Harthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01058877428309776731noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8587336.post-59238192241288863882022-07-01T19:17:43.217-07:002022-07-01T19:17:43.217-07:00DP:
On this interpretation the death of the unbor...DP:<br /><i><br />On this interpretation the death of the unborn child merits a 'fine' but further harm to the mother merits 'life for life'. I<br /></i><br /><br />So the Bible clearly ascribes personhood to the mother but not to the fetus. Clarence Thomas thinks God got it backwards.Larry Harthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01058877428309776731noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8587336.post-43938526309952924462022-07-01T18:35:23.835-07:002022-07-01T18:35:23.835-07:00Which brings us to the concept of quickening.
Unt...Which brings us to the concept of quickening.<br /><br />Until the late 1800s a fetus was not assumed by the Catholic Church to be ensouled until quickening. St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas both cited a point after conception, generally the point of quickening, as the moment at which the life in the womb becomes human, meaning ensouled with a rational human soul. According to St. Augustine that occurred 40 days after conception for boys and 80 days for girls (girls being considered inferior). Abortion was always considered to be sinful by the Catholic church, but it was not considered murder until the late 19th century when Pope Pius IX released the encyclical “Apostolica Sedis Moderationi” in 1869. <br /><br />The condemnation of abortion without regard to quickening or stage of fetal development is still the official doctrine of the Roman Catholic Church. Catholics who knowingly procure an abortion face excommunication.DPhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07087941506162882852noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8587336.post-52004778091215726982022-07-01T18:35:08.183-07:002022-07-01T18:35:08.183-07:00As for the fetus, according to the Bible in Exodus...As for the fetus, according to the Bible in Exodus 21 some fetuses are more equal than others.<br /><br />https://humanjourney.org.uk/articles/exodus-21-and-abortion/<br /><br />When men strive together and hit a pregnant woman, so that her children come out [yatsa], but there is no harm [ason], the one who hit her shall surely be fined, as the woman's husband shall impose on him, and he shall pay as the judges determine. But if there is harm, then you shall pay life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.<br /><br />The Revised Standard Version translates 'her children come out' with the phrase 'there is a miscarriage'. This implies that the 'harm' refers only to the woman. This is explicit in the New Jerusalem Bible: 'she suffers a miscarriage but no further harm is done'. On this interpretation the death of the unborn child merits a 'fine' but further harm to the mother merits 'life for life'. In favour of this interpretation is the witness of Josephus in the first century AD:<br /><br />He that kicks a woman with child, so that the woman miscarry, let him pay a fine in money... as having diminished the multitude by the destruction of what was in her womb...but if she die of the stroke, let him also be put to death.<br /><br />A second ancient interpretation of this passage allows that 'harm' applies to the unborn child, but only after this child is 'formed'. The most influential Greek translation of the Old Testament, the Septuagint, makes a distinction not between harm to the unborn child (a fine) and the woman (life for life) but between harm to the unformed embryo (a fine) and the formed foetus (life for life). The Jewish philosopher Philo, an older contemporary of Josephus, follows this interpretation:<br /><br />If the child within her is still unfashioned and unformed, he shall be punished by a fine...But if the child had assumed a distinct shape in all its parts, having received all its proper and distinctive qualities, he shall die.<br /><br />So an unformed fetus was not considered to be a human being, but something less whose death only incurred a fine not the death penalty for murder.<br /><br />DPhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07087941506162882852noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8587336.post-50784925802072521102022-07-01T18:34:41.834-07:002022-07-01T18:34:41.834-07:00Myrrh was also used as a contraceptive as in the b...Myrrh was also used as a contraceptive as in the book of Esther as used by Queen Esther and other wives of the Persian king.<br /><br />https://www.salon.com/2014/01/05/biblical_birth_control_the_surprisingly_contraception_friendly_old_testament/<br /><br />In an article in the scholarly journal Conservative Judaism, Rabbi Joseph Prouser points out that the King’s potential wives were all required to anoint themselves with myrrh oil and aromatic herbs for one full year – which is a pretty long time for what some read as just a beauty treatment. Myrrh was a known contraceptive at the time, cited in the writings of Soranus of Ephesus, a Greek physician who was an expert on gynecology and midwifery. He explained that when used in a pessary, myrrh oil would work as an abortifacient, preventing the implantation of fertilized eggs. The aromatic herbs may have also had contraceptive properties.<br /><br />So let's sum this up: An Israelite husband suspects his wife has been fooling around but has no witnesses. So he makes here drink "biter water". If she is pregnant, the fetus gets aborted right there in the tabernacle and his rival's baby is killed. If she is not pregnant I guess he figures no harm no foul. But it's a crap shoot whether the woman survives ingesting all of that filth from the tabernacle floor. And it's possible both she and her lover's baby survive. Anyway its all seen as God's judgement.<br /><br />But the Bible isn't exactly what we would call pro-life now is it?<br /><br />DPhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07087941506162882852noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8587336.post-60403693498653037342022-07-01T18:33:55.889-07:002022-07-01T18:33:55.889-07:00Something they don't teach you in right wing S...Something they don't teach you in right wing Sunday school.<br /><br />The Bible has a recipe for an abortion which was used in a ritual known as the "Ordeal of Bitter Waters"<br /><br />https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordeal_of_the_bitter_water<br /><br />The ordeal of the bitter water was a trial by ordeal administered to the wife whose husband suspected her of adultery but who had no witnesses to make a formal case (Numbers 5:11–31)<br /><br />Basically, if an Israelite husband suspects his wife of fooling around - and the child she may be carrying is not his - but has no witnesses, he will take her to the tabernacle and and put her to the test by making her drink "bitter water" mixed with dust from the floor of the tabernacle along with ink used to write curses on a scroll. <br /><br />16 “‘The priest shall bring her and have her stand before the Lord. 17 Then he shall take some holy water in a clay jar and put some dust from the tabernacle floor into the water. 18 After the priest has had the woman stand before the Lord, he shall loosen her hair and place in her hands the reminder-offering, the grain offering for jealousy, while he himself holds the bitter water that brings a curse. 19 Then the priest shall put the woman under oath and say to her, “If no other man has had sexual relations with you and you have not gone astray and become impure while married to your husband, may this bitter water that brings a curse not harm you. 20 But if you have gone astray while married to your husband and you have made yourself impure by having sexual relations with a man other than your husband”— 21 here the priest is to put the woman under this curse—“may the Lord cause you to become a curse[b] among your people when he makes your womb miscarry and your abdomen swell. 22 May this water that brings a curse enter your body so that your abdomen swells or your womb miscarries.”<br /><br />Different translations use the euphemism of "rotted thighs" for miscarriage's and abdomen is the Hebrew usage for womb.<br /><br />23 “‘The priest is to write these curses on a scroll and then wash them off into the bitter water. 24 He shall make the woman drink the bitter water that brings a curse, and this water that brings a curse and causes bitter suffering will enter her. 25 The priest is to take from her hands the grain offering for jealousy, wave it before the Lord and bring it to the altar. 26 The priest is then to take a handful of the grain offering as a memorial[c] offering and burn it on the altar; after that, he is to have the woman drink the water. 27 If she has made herself impure and been unfaithful to her husband, this will be the result: When she is made to drink the water that brings a curse and causes bitter suffering, it will enter her, her abdomen will swell and her womb will miscarry, and she will become a curse. 28 If, however, the woman has not made herself impure, but is clean, she will be cleared of guilt and will be able to have children.<br /><br />About that "dust". That would be the sweepings of the tabernacle's burnt animal offerings, a nasty bacteriological soup, and myrrh (on of the three gifts given to baby Jesus by the Wise Men). Myrrh was kept burning in the tabernacle as an incense mixed with other spices. So the dust would be a mixture of ash and soot from the incense and burnt animals. <br /><br />However, myrrh is an abortifacient. <br /><br />https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5265628/<br /><br />And at the time around when this was written they were still sacrificing animals, so blood, urine, feces, and general intestinal ick would likely be present in the dirt of the tabernacle floor as well. So you've got a natural abortifacient and a whole slew of nasty bacteria.<br /><br />DPhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07087941506162882852noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8587336.post-34052928552845486992022-07-01T17:47:18.588-07:002022-07-01T17:47:18.588-07:00It's not just Hollywood propaganda. I've t...It's not just Hollywood propaganda. I've traveled and worked a lot in the US. Americans almost invariably, in every state red/blue/purple have a common trait. They are truly interested and curious about outlanders. Even if they quickly revert to American exceptionalism/superiority, for a brief, shining moment, they want to hear tales from the horizon. It is so charming.scidatahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07152319593457629592noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8587336.post-90803394485022415002022-07-01T17:37:32.112-07:002022-07-01T17:37:32.112-07:00Alfred - great "theory" about how it all...Alfred - great "theory" about how it all works<br /><br />Killed stone dead by the actual FACTS of the case<br /><br />In hindsight the idea of making a Car that car people would buy is obvious<br /><br />At the time there were dozens - possibly hundreds - of wanna be EV makers - and they all missed the obvious - despite their VC's and all of that <br /><br />Reminds me of my University training where beer soaked engineering students would learn in a few hours something that some genius double brain took 20 years to develop<br /><br />Following is always easier duncan cairncrosshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14153725128216947145noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8587336.post-87521525814807400042022-07-01T16:45:12.619-07:002022-07-01T16:45:12.619-07:00Actually, I never cease to be amazed by how much g...Actually, I never cease to be amazed by how much goodwill there is out there - around the globe - toward Americans, who are generally rather well liked compared to most rivals and certainly compared to any past Imperium. The success of Hollywood propaganda may be one factor, along with the visible diversity of our cultural and political (though not financial or wealth) leader castes.<br /><br />Another factor may be that the world sees us relentlessly criticising ourselves for our faults. Our children are trained to do it. So were most of you. While that serves ammo to our rivals, it also neutralizes much of the rancor.David Brinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14465315130418506525noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8587336.post-12215616135750459932022-07-01T15:10:57.511-07:002022-07-01T15:10:57.511-07:00Few people "love" the Americans
Heh. So...<i>Few people "love" the Americans</i><br /><br />Heh. Something must be amiss with them. 8)<br /><br />Another error some of us make is to think of the Kurds as one bloc. They aren't. They've been divided for many centuries and their neighbors take advantage of that.<br /><br />Turkey can't afford to leave NATO if Greece remains a member. Same also the other way around. Not yet anyway. Maybe in another generation if Turkey moves back into the power vacuum left by the disappearance of the Ottomans.Alfred Differhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01170159981105973192noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8587336.post-8498960973660951092022-07-01T15:03:35.681-07:002022-07-01T15:03:35.681-07:00Switching from an econo-car to a roadster is exact...Switching from an econo-car to a roadster is exactly the kind of thing done by someone who knows a thing or two about sales. <br /><br />Anyone who can get a VC to let them in the door to make a pitch has seen the related questions.<br /><br />1. What is your market? How big is it? Who are your competitors? What fraction of total sales to you expect to capture?<br /><br />followed up by...<br /><br />2. Why not this other related market? Where does the experience of your sales team excel? What secondary sales can you make? Describe tangential offshoot business lines related to your primary goal.<br /><br />If you walk into a meeting with them already have the tech guys in your team, they will graft a sales team onto you IF they are interested. That often means adopting their suggested CEO. Smart tech guys will smile and say "Yes sir" because revenue opens the door to future investment rounds, tangential businesses, and those tech people being grafted into some other business the VC's know that need some engineering help.<br /><br />Lone cowboy CEO's building everything from scratch is romantic claptrap. That dream is easy to believe, though, because TRAINED CEO's walking into a team that needs them make it look effortless. <br /><br /><i>Tell me about this. Do that. Hire talent for such and such teams. Trim your expectations in this round, but keep them for the next.</i> Etc.<br /><br />Fanboys are just that. Believers in the romantic claptrap. Look past them at what the well led, effective teams are doing to understand the real impact of strong leadership.Alfred Differhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01170159981105973192noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8587336.post-46554863079933711952022-07-01T15:02:47.424-07:002022-07-01T15:02:47.424-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Der Ogerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00977602334642769985noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8587336.post-47327812958139736002022-07-01T12:12:56.150-07:002022-07-01T12:12:56.150-07:00What I was trying to say after the 2016 election.....What I was trying to say after the 2016 election...<br /><br />https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/30/opinion/trump-january-6-cassidy-hutchinson.html<br /><i><br />What has Trump’s presidency taken from us? I’m reasonably sure that many Americans feel the same loss that I do, and I’m struggling to assign just one word to it.<br /><br />Innocence? Optimism? Faith? Go to the place on the Venn diagram where those states of mind overlap. That’s the piece of me now missing when I look at this beloved country of mine.<br /><br />Trump snuffed out my confidence, flickering but real, that we could go only so low and forgive only so much.<br /></i>Larry Harthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01058877428309776731noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8587336.post-18703526094450672692022-07-01T12:06:55.242-07:002022-07-01T12:06:55.242-07:00Again (and again) EM did with his inherited mid-le...Again (and again) EM did with his inherited mid-level wealth what the Rand/Federalist/MintonFriedmanites all said ALL inheritance brats would do... invest in risky but potentially highly productive enterprises. Now... right now... name another who actually did that. I can, but can you?<br /><br />Tesla's econo-car was utterly doomed (and did fail). Elon brilliantly saw how incredible the e-motors had become and made and made the Roadster, instead, which at ONE stroke uttely killed the 100 year bad rep of EVs. At ONE stroke he made it clear. Now bet me on the timing of when thebig car companies stopped squashing EV startups and started establishing instead their own EV development lines?<br /><br />What? No bet?<br /><br />Yes, Obama switched some of the lamprey-leech suck of subsidies from vampire Lockheed-Boeing/ULA to SpaceX... and ...it... paid... off. VERY soon, which is what subsidies are supposed to do. SpaceX broke every expectation, delivered on every promise and became insanely profitable while driving down launch costs for the taxpayer. Three times it skated close to being killed by ULA and their in-pocket senators. But Obama ran interference and Elon staked everything he had, to bridge those gaps.<br /><br />There is nothing whatsoever that Jon S said that is even remotely in the ballpark of true. Well, maybe the Paypal stuff. So? BFD. Em was better at building real stuff.David Brinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14465315130418506525noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8587336.post-86055088200122061122022-07-01T11:59:17.376-07:002022-07-01T11:59:17.376-07:00David Smelser:
LH asked "Serious question--w...David Smelser:<br /><i><br />LH asked "Serious question--why does the supreme court even bother pretending to use legal reasoning to get from the written law to the outcome they desire?"<br /><br />I think the main reason is so that they can refer to their own rulings when making future rulings. Go read their current rulings and look at how often they quote themselves.<br /></i><br /><br />How long before they just do the Trump thing, "Many people are saying..." ?Larry Harthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01058877428309776731noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8587336.post-74016810058995592502022-07-01T11:56:29.895-07:002022-07-01T11:56:29.895-07:00Jon S,
Every investor brings money from somewhere...Jon S,<br /><br />Every investor brings money from somewhere.<br /><br />As for PayPal, a lot of us know the story. Musk's fanboys blow the trumpet too much, but it's not that different from what happens with respect to other CEO's with egos. <br /><br />The primary job of a CEO is "chief sales person" where they are the closer on big deals. Much of that relies upon reputation. Much of sales does too. Those of us who know it just look past the fluff to the numbers behind it.<br /><br />As for experience as a CEO, we all acquire it through hard lessons. Steve Jobs became a better CEO after getting canned at Apple. He was always a visionary, but CEO's do a different job. Musk learned too... and has plenty more to learn.<br /><br />---<br /><br />No one is puppeting Duncan. It would be pretty obvious if they were. <br /><br />Some of us are willing to put up with character flaws to get benefits from those around us. Musk has learned enough to gather large, effective teams around him. Those teams are pushing a vision of the future some of us like. A lot.Alfred Differhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01170159981105973192noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8587336.post-38420076993990467632022-07-01T10:57:05.016-07:002022-07-01T10:57:05.016-07:00Duncan, his initial fortune came from an emerald m...Duncan, his initial fortune came from an emerald mine that his grandfather reportedly stole from native African miners. He was extremely wealthy before he ever got here.<br /><br />Try checking out actual historical reports, not just what Elon and his fans are claiming. Even the Wikipedia article, which has doubtless been "edited" on occasion, makes note of this (his first venture, an online yellow-pages search engine, was started with funds acquired from his father).<br /><br />Incidentally, while researching this, I did learn that Musk did not found, nor have anything to do with the creation of, PayPal. As noted here:<br /><br /><i>In 1999, Musk co-founded X.com, an online financial services and e-mail payment company.[54] The startup was one of the first federally insured online banks, and, in its initial months of operation, over 200,000 customers joined the service.[55] The company's investors regarded Musk as inexperienced and replaced him with Intuit CEO Bill Harris by the end of the year.[56] The following year, X.com merged with online bank Confinity to avoid competition.[44][56][57] Founded by Max Levchin and Peter Thiel,[58] Confinity had its own money-transfer service, PayPal, which was more popular than X.com's service.[59]<br /><br />Within the merged company, Musk returned as CEO. Musk's preference for Microsoft software over Unix created a rift in the company and caused Thiel to resign.[60] Due to resulting technological issues and lack of a cohesive business model, the board ousted Musk and replaced him with Thiel in September 2000.[61][c] Under Thiel, the company focused on the PayPal service and was renamed PayPal in 2001.[63][64] In 2002, PayPal was acquired by eBay for $1.5 billion in stock, of which Musk—the largest shareholder with 11.72% of shares—received $175.8 million.[65][66] In 2017, Musk purchased the domain X.com from PayPal for an undisclosed amount, explaining it has sentimental value.[67][68] </i>Jon S.https://www.blogger.com/profile/13585842845661267920noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8587336.post-43470479779552284712022-07-01T08:41:20.780-07:002022-07-01T08:41:20.780-07:00LH asked "Serious question--why does the supr...LH asked "Serious question--why does the supreme court even bother pretending to use legal reasoning to get from the written law to the outcome they desire?"<br /><br />I think the main reason is so that they can refer to their own rulings when making future rulings. Go read their current rulings and look at how often they quote themselves.David Smelserhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08596446730839038592noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8587336.post-85855030255581656902022-07-01T06:58:18.358-07:002022-07-01T06:58:18.358-07:00Dobbs is the most savored victory for the Right si...Dobbs is the most savored victory for the Right since the first battle of Bull Run.Alan Brookshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17996922923136240709noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8587336.post-49294330925636689712022-07-01T06:08:10.651-07:002022-07-01T06:08:10.651-07:00The headline says it all...
https://www.cnn.com/2...The headline says it all...<br /><br />https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/01/politics/us-climate-decision-supreme-court-threat-to-world/index.html<br /><i><br /><b>The Supreme Court’s conservative majority is a threat to the world</b><br /></i>Larry Harthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01058877428309776731noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8587336.post-2281724848417610822022-07-01T05:18:03.784-07:002022-07-01T05:18:03.784-07:00An article about Musk's subsidies:
https://ww...An article about Musk's subsidies:<br /><br />https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-list-government-subsidies-tesla-billions-spacex-solarcity-2021-12<br /><br /><br />This article might be of interest, given some of the topics discussed here:<br /><br />https://aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/5.0090017Roberthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04909011338723657265noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8587336.post-72437654939297835432022-06-30T23:40:23.414-07:002022-06-30T23:40:23.414-07:00Jon S
Your ravings are so far from the truth that ...Jon S<br />Your ravings are so far from the truth that I suspect Locum is somehow sock puppeting you!!<br /><br />Complete and TOTAL BALLS<br />Musk's wealth came from a games company then the company that became PayPal - No bloody trust funds involved<br />His influence on Tesla has been HUGE - before he was involved Tesla wanted to go the same way as all of the other EV failures - an "Eco Car" <br />And its total insanity to say that SpaceX has had more subsidies than the others!!<br />SpaceX provides a SERVICE and is paid for that service<br />Musk has contributed more to help the future of Humanity than anybody else in the last 50 years<br /><br />duncan cairncrosshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14153725128216947145noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8587336.post-42243066661097019312022-06-30T22:48:10.561-07:002022-06-30T22:48:10.561-07:00Dr. Brin, we're not going after Musk first - h...Dr. Brin, we're not going after Musk first - he just catches a lot of it because his moves are even more obviously egregious than, for instance, Thiel (who mostly moves in the background in his efforts to destroy our society).<br /><br />However, you seem to be slowly turning into one of those weird Elon fanbois who desperately throw themselves against any perceived attack against His Holiness Musk the First. For crying out loud, it's pretty public knowledge that (for instance) Tesla Motors was an existing corporation, with existing plans to use their new technology to build a sports car to capture imaginations, that had merely been looking for a financial backer, and Musk's sole contribution was to use some (small) fraction of <i>his</i> inherited trust fund to purchase the company, then sue the founders any time they mentioned that he wasn't one of them. The SpaceX rocket was the result of a monetary challenge, and its subsequent success is due in large part to a heavy governmental thumb on the scales (in the form of <i>massive</i> subsidies not provided either Blue Origin or Virgin Galactic). And as an autistic myself, I'd like to think I'm pretty good at spotting my own kind. He strikes me as more of an outright asshole who claims to be autistic in an attempt to deflect anyone pointing out his assholery.Jon S.https://www.blogger.com/profile/13585842845661267920noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8587336.post-74078487839183285132022-06-30T22:22:19.929-07:002022-06-30T22:22:19.929-07:00Found it
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0769XK...Found it<br />https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0769XK7D6/ref=kinw_myk_ro_title<br /><br />Factfulness: Ten Reasons We're Wrong About The World - And Why Things Are Better Than You Thinkduncan cairncrosshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14153725128216947145noreply@blogger.com